Fćrsluflokkur: Bloggar
Prohibition of Cannabis!Its total bs!!
3.12.2009 | 20:39
The prohibition of cannabis is something i have never understood.
For the record i do not drink,smoke or use any other types of drugs.
But i do not understand why we bother chaseing cannabis users.
Ive seen in the news police working with energy companys and heatseeking choppers flying over suspect places.
I saw that and tought to myself "I wonder how much all this costs ? And who are they protecting?"
How does our goverment justify the spending to use heatseeking choppers.
So what does cannabis do to us that is so bad?
Well it has been said that cannabis kills brain cell´s,makes people lazy,leads people to harder drugs and that its highly addictive.
So lets look at this one by one.
Cannabis causes brain damage!
1974 The Dr Heath/Tulane study was the 1st report to back this up, it was issued by Ronald Reagan.This report was done by "The most reliable scientific sources" and said that permanent brain damage was inevitable result of using cannabis.
Monkeys were pumped with 30 columbian strength joints a day and months after started to show low brain cell count and some would even die.So for almost around 30 years people think based mainly on this study that it does kill brain cells.
After six years of asking how this report was done they revealed how it was done.
They took the moneys and placed a gas mask on them and pumping 63 joints for 5 mins over 3 months.So in other words they suffocated the monkeys and we all know that 4 mins without oxygen may result in brain damage.So what about doing that over and over and over again for 5 mins.
Studys since have shown no signs of any brain cells damage.
Next one.
Cannabis smoke will causes lung cancer,brown lung or emphysema!
The first report about this was mirrord by the US goverment from smoking reports.
They had to use words like may or should cause lung cancer,brown lung or emphysema.
They backed this with nothing other then gesture and that all smoke is the same smoke.But in reality there are no cases of cannabis only users getting lung cancer,brown lung or emphysema.
Then a report came out from Dr.Donald Tashkin UCLA saying "Marijuana smoking does not cause lung cancer".And many other have followed in same suit.
Next one
Cannabis is highly addictive!
Well it is true that more kids or teenagers are in treatment for marijuana then any other drug.
The reality is that most of young marijuana smokers today when arrested for possession are offerd 2 choices.Rehab or jail! And i dont know about you but i think most of us would pick rehab.
In studys done around varius rehab centers it showed that 93% of the marijuana users where in treatment in voluntary.
So that does by no means show us how addictive this drug is.But if you go to any rehab centers homepage and you will see the list.
- Nicotine
- Heroin
- Cocaine
- Alcohol
- Caffeine
- Marijuana ?
So how many of us drink coffe ?Well sad to tell you this you are more addictive then any marijuana user to that drink then he is to that plant.Im would not support the prohibition of coffe nor would i support the prohibition of marijuana.
Next one.
Marijuana leads people to harder drugs!
Well there are no natural evidence showing us this, there is nothing in the plant that will push people to want cocaine or heroin.So what then?Why do so many people claim that marijuana is a gateway drug?
Well lets look at who sells them.most drug dealers sell a varaiety of drugs, from ecstacy down to cocaine and morphine.So if we really look at it, the drug dealers are a gateway to drugs and marijuana has nothing to do with it at all.
You never heard about a man drinking coffe and after that great cup he wanted to go shoot some black tar heroin have you ?The notion is silly but if we really look at it we would not have this problem if this was not a illegal drug.
Next one.
Cannabis makes people lazy and unmotivated, other words useless to society!
Now lets look at this fact a little bit.How many times have you heard about a politician who smoked marijuana before ? Well we all know about Bill Clinton and his lies about not inhaling the smoke.
Former president George W. Bush was a avid user.Ted Turner one of the richest men in the world smokes a joint everyday, this is the man who created CNN news smoking pot.
Michael Phelps all time olympian smokes but is known to be the best swimmer in the world today.
Beetles,Rolling Stones most other famous bands used some or all these drugs.There is nothing backing this up other then people opinions.
People who have character defects are gona be lazy/unmotivated with or without the use of marijuana.
So in closing you wont get anymore addicted to it then drinking coffe.It does not cause brain damage.It wont cause lung cancer,brown lung or emphysema.People do not get lazy and uselss while using marijuana.It has nothing in it that leads to harder drugs.
There has never ever in the history of the world been a death directly related to the use of marijuana.
If this plant is not this crazy drug we have been lead to belive it is then why do we allow our goverment to use extreme methods to catch,trail and convict people who use,sell or grow marijuana.
All this costs money and that money is coming out of our taxes.
This money could be used to feed people who are having finacial problems.
This money could be used for our health care and education systems.
We should allow it,control it,tax it and put all the money into our health care.
So we wont spend money hunting some low level plant growers, we would be getting money from this harmless plant.
Feel free to share your view.
Best regards Mr.Rooster.
Fangelsi fyrir kannabisrćkt | |
Tilkynna um óviđeigandi tengingu viđ frétt |
Bloggar | Slóđ | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Religious Nut!
5.9.2009 | 21:04
John Ashcroft hmmmm.......
Remember when he spent $8000 to cover 2 statues aluminum alloy tin tittie´s in the halls of justice?
Yeah apperantly John Ashcroft was not able to focus in the halls of justice with aluminum tits showing.
Remember when he went after Tommy Chung in the famous "Operation Pipe Dreams" after september the 11th?
From Wiki Operation Pipe dreams.
"Operation pipe dreams was the code-name for a U.S. nationwide investigation in 2003 targeting businesses selling drug paraphernalia, mostly marijuana pipes and bongs, under a little-used statute (Title 21, Chapter 13, Subchapter 1, Part D, Section 863(a)[1]) of the U.S. Code.
Hundreds of businesses and homes were raided as a result of Operation Pipe Dreams. Fifty five people were named in indictments and charged with trafficking of illegal drug paraphernalia. While 54 of the 55 individuals charged were sentenced to fines and home detentions, actor Tommy Chong was sentenced on 11 September 2003 to 9 months in a federal prison, forfeiture of $103,000, and a year of probation. Federal Prosecution admitted to being harsher on Chong in retaliation, citing Chong's movies as trivializing "law enforcement efforts to combat drug trafficking and use"
Yeah thats right Tommy Chung from Cheech and Chong who loned his name to the company and had nothing to do with the selling of any bongs or such was the main focus of operation pipe dreams, his only fult was that John Ashcroft wanted someone famous to get more spotlight on this little witch hunt.He later said that either he took full responsibility or they would go after his family.
So Tommy was the only one to do jail time thanks to John Ashcroft.
Remeber the Vanity Fair article on John Ashcroft from February 2004 issue?
Among other things, describes how Ashcroft fears calico cats, how he attended opponent Mel Carnahan's funeral against the family's wishes, how Ashcroft's dad put him at the controls of a plane with no training at age 8, and how parts of Justice Department boilerplate were altered because they conflicted with the Seven Deadly Sins.
John Ashcroft is a religious nut and religious nuts should be as far away from politics as possible.
Dont get me wrong politicians are just as annoying as the fundamental christians but the two put together is a nightmare.He belives that calico cats are the sign of the devil.
Here is a calico cat, he looks kinda like the devil right?
It should scare you that people so high in the political food chain have this as there belief´s.
There judgment is based on there religious views on the world and that is scary when it comes to fundamental christians.
Im just glad that the american people are free of him and i hope his kids are not to screwd up.
Best regards Mr.Rooster.
Hćgt ađ lögsćkja Ashcroft | |
Tilkynna um óviđeigandi tengingu viđ frétt |
Bloggar | Breytt 6.9.2009 kl. 00:07 | Slóđ | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Hugo Chavez vs U.S
5.9.2009 | 05:17
For people who do not know about Hugo Chavez this has been done before.U.S staged a coup with some 1000´s of people.They started in 2002 to try to take him out.
They call him a terrorist and say he is killing his people.
But where is the proof? We do have proof that when america started to focus on Chavez in 2002 that Venuzela supplied the U.S with 15% of there oil needs, what did Chavez want to do ?
Hugo Chavez was domecratically elected following a long line of dictators.And he ran on the pretence that he was gona use the venezuelan oil to help the people of Venezuela.
He won and started to implement some policy´s for his people using the money from the oil. These policy´s ranged mainly to the poor varied from reducing food prices to offering free education for all ages and free public health systems.
When John Pilger went to Venezuela and talked to Hugo Chavez we could see that senior Chavez was nothing like the american media potrayed him to be.John also talked to the upper class and all the way down to the people living in huts.
The most of the rich people where unhappy with Chavez but all of the poor people where happy and adored Chavez.WHY? Why are the rich unhappy and poor happy?
Could it be that the rich people are making less money due to Chavez´s policy´s? Chavez has acted as a true gentleman towards other developing countrys in latin america, he wanted latin america to be able to break away from the empire that is the U.S.
Ill bet you anything that the people outside of Venezuela have no clue whats going on in that country and protest only on the propaganda they get from the mainstream media.
These are the real Hugo Chavez supporters and there are quite a lot of them in Venezuela. Ill show you all a ABC interview with Hugo Chavez and Barbara Walters enjoy.
Regards Mr.Rooster.
Gengiđ gegn Hugo Chavez | |
Tilkynna um óviđeigandi tengingu viđ frétt |
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 05:21 | Slóđ | Facebook | Athugasemdir (10)
Obama The Deception
4.9.2009 | 07:13
That is the name of a Alex Jones movie.
That movie goes over Obamas campaign promisees, like his word to close down Guantanamo Bay or the one with his promise that he would bring back the troops in Iraq and that there was no military solution in Iraq.
I mean this man ran on these promisees and people voted based on these things and of course that he is black.So what did he do after he was elected and sworn in.
The day after we saw Obama closeing Guantanamo Bay or did we ? We saw him sign a paper and the media headlines where clear that Obama was infact closeing down GTMB.
Well when people where able to read the legislation there was no official closeing of GTMB it only said they would look into closing it down and find a new facility to house there new inmates or supected terrorists.
Then we look at what he said on the war in Iraq.
He said he would bring american troops back right away if he would be elected and then what ? The man changes it to within the next 16 months then it changes to around 23 months, later his staff informed everybody when asked if Obama would not be bound by his promise they infact replied no "President Obama will not be bound by these promisees".
What the hell is going on ? Obama was anti-war when he wanted votes now after he got them he is pro-war?
That is infact 100% correct Obama is not the savior everybody wants to make him out to be. Last thing i heard was he backed 20,000 more troops to Afganistan and its not to go after some fake terrorist organisation named al-Qaeda its always been about setting up military base´s and oil.
Just look at the numbers. Terrorist acts are estimated to kill around 1500 people per year now 68 out of those 1500 are listed as americans.So 68 die annually from terrorist every year so that number alone does not justify the 500 billion budget to go after this problem. In america 120 people die from penut allergies so penut´s are more of a killer then terrorists.
No man with half a brain would spent 500 billion US$ for 68 deaths and that reason alone.
Now in the words of Major General Smedley D. Butler a Major General in the U.S. Marine Corps."WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes."
This means that the wars in Iraq,Afganistan and soon to be Iran are wars not ment to be won but sustained for profit and control of the middle east.
So dont be fooled by al-Qaeda propaganda and the none stop use of the word terrorist. The real terrorists are the media and the goverment of U.S. They hipnotically repeat the words terrorist injecting fear into its viewers which would make them the terrorists if we go by the meaning of the word.
Take a step back and watch the movie Obama the Deception its free over the internet. Also watch 911 blueprint for truth (also free) and see how far these men are willing to go.
Best Regards.
Mr.Rooster.
Mega ekki yfirgefa Afganistan | |
Tilkynna um óviđeigandi tengingu viđ frétt |
Bloggar | Slóđ | Facebook | Athugasemdir (4)
Iceland´s Geothermal Energy
2.9.2009 | 13:04
Now Rooster is amazed.
Icelandic people have no clue what this will come to.
Iceland´s Geothermal Energy is in abundance and the fact Icelandic people have to pay more then just the start up cost is nothing but greed that society allowes to happen on a day to day basis.
If someone would come up to you and ask you to pay for water in Iceland they would laugh and tell them to walk the same would go with air and that becauce its in such high abundances.
Charging for them here would not make sense.
Then lets look at energy!
The most powerfull source of energy in the world is proper solar power wich is constant and never ending along with geothermal energy.
Geothermal Energy in planet earth is around 13,000 ZJ (according to MIT´s report in 2006) , with 2000 ZJ easily taped.Now the world uses around 0,5 ZJ per year so lets do the math.
2000 ZJ / 0,5 = 4000 years of clean energy.
And as we all know this heat will not vapor from earth but renew its self and there for this energy source is limitless.
So why in the world if there is such abundance of energy and mediums we can harnest it do we have to pay for it?
I understand we have to pay for the structure and even salary for employes but not ongoing payments for how much MW we use per day/months or years.
The fact is that most people do not understand how much energy there is avilible for Iceland or any other country for that matter.
The Icelandic goverment has for a long time been derailed and focussed on helping there pockets rather then there people and this has been proven just IceSave and your fish, there are no visionaries around anymore in icelandic politics
In polictics there are very few in any people you could trust.The fact is they lack vision and will to create a society that evolves to better its people.They attack our natural resources either with privatizing,lone contracts or taxes.
I vote NEI!
I say lets start creating a society filled with with enough abundance, efficiency, and sustainability.
Lets try to free people rather to enslave them to payments for inheritance our natural resources.
The goverment has no intrest in lowering the cost for icelandic people on energy even tho we have such abbundance.Water and energy is your inheritance and should not be owned by anybody but the people of Iceland not a company.
ITS YOUR RESOURCES ITS YOUR INHERITANCE ITS YOURS AND ONLY YOURS.
But you have to fight for them stand up and protect them.
They will not lower energy bills but make you pay even more for all energy and slowly but surely they will have there profit and that profit will come from you.
With hopes and love.
Rooster Cockwell.
Segir samninga viđ HS Orku í samrćmi viđ orkulög | |
Tilkynna um óviđeigandi tengingu viđ frétt |
Bloggar | Breytt 3.9.2009 kl. 11:05 | Slóđ | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)